While Ebola was extremely deadly, it certainly wasn’t as contagious as the novel coronavirus. It killed up to 50% of those it infected, but mostly spread through bodily fluids. Unlike COVD-19, symptoms of Ebola were very severe and, as a result, health officials were able to diagnose and isolate people who had been infected.
The 2009 flu pandemic, also known as H1N1, was the second most deadly pandemic in human history. In about a year, around 1.4 billion people around the world were infected, and estimates show that the swine flu killed up to 575,400 people.
In comparison with what we’re currently facing, the mortality rate for the novel coronavirus is already expected to be much higher (current studies indicate that it’s around 2%). What exactly does this mean? It could mean that what we’re currently dealing with could produce far more deaths than the world witnessed in 2009-2010.
Like COVID-19, SARS is another type of coronavirus. It also originated in China and spread quickly via respiratory droplets. Also, like the current coronavirus, SARS originated in bats and was likely to have spread to humans in Chinese wet markets.
While the fatality rate was much higher with SARS (9.6%) it didn’t affect nearly as many people as what we’re facing now. In fact, during the span of the pathogen, only 8,439 cases were reported.
Global populations responded to SARS in many of the same ways as we are currently responding to COVID-19. In the end, just eight months after the first case was reported, the virus died out. As a result of good luck and quick public health response, the world carried on as usual relatively quick